간만에 라이카 100-400 리뷰가 올라왔습니다.
www.stevehuffphoto.com/2016...
iPhone 5s | Program Normal | 4.15mm | ISO-32 | F2.2 | 1/470s | 0.00 EV | Multi-Segment | Auto WB | 2016-04-02 15:12:41
SAMSUNG-SM-G925A | Program Normal | 4.30mm | ISO-40 | F1.9 | 1/620s | 0.00 EV | Centre Weighted Average | Auto WB | 2016-04-02 15:16:55
CONCLUSION
I like this lens a great deal. I have never had this kind of reach before, and for some of the subjects I like to shoot I feel it will be invaluable. I’m very impressed that the IQ compares “quite well” to the Olympus 40-150mm. If I was going on a trip where I wanted this extra reach, I’d have no problem leaving that Oly lens at home, maybe throwing in a couple of Olympus primes for the intermediate range.
All things considered, this is an effective 800mm lens that is 6.5” long (collapsed) – a modern marvel, in my book anyway.
Would really have been nice to compare my images with my friend’s, with his Canon bazooka. Especially since his older body is also a 16mp like the OMD M5 II. But I’m not trying to get into NatGeo with my images. I especially appreciate the size/weight/value proposition of this Panasonic lens. His outings with that lens are few and far between, whereas I can bring this lens along anytime I want.
Although I didn’t show these images, for a while it appeared to me that images at 300mm were superior to those at 400mm. I did some test shots and cropped the 300mm ones to see an equivalent. Upon review, my thoughts just didn’t seem to hold up. I didn’t see any significant degradation at 400mm vs 300mm.
★ 워프짱™님의 팝코 앨범 ★
https://photo.popco.net/o2warp
